reflexive là gì

Half the items used reflexives and half used personal pronouns.

The issue at hand is the acquisition of reflexives.

Bạn đang xem: reflexive là gì

With these two constraints alone, reflexives are predicted đồ sộ be correctly understood and produced, yet pronouns are only predicted đồ sộ be correctly produced.

Pronouns and reflexives were interpreted equally well in this condition, at the high level at which reflexives are interpreted in other conditions.

Processing of reflexives, where the interpretation is obtained within the clause via syntactic mechanisms alone, is less costly phàn nàn that of referentially ambiguous pronouns.

On average, the reflexives, himself and herself, were approximately three times as long as the pronouns, him and her (330 ms vs. 100 ms).

We make use of the binding theory for reflexives.

Then why tự we need đồ sộ distinguish between local coargument reflexives and m-reflexives if both of them are associated with syntactic binding ?

Xem thêm: lịch sử trong tiếng anh là gì

Subjects were asked đồ sộ judge the grammaticality of sentences containing reflexives and embedded clauses with or without complementizers lượt thích "that" present.

More specifically, they focus on the processing of intrasentential anaphora, especially of intrasentential reflexives and pronouns during language comprehension.

In sum, we can say that children are equally good at producing and comprehending reflexives and pronouns if a coherent discourse is provided.

The basic intuition derived from the contrast in (1a) and (1b) is that reflexives and pronouns are in complementary distribution.

In their first three experiments, children's comprehension of object pronouns and reflexives was studied in sentences with referential subjects.

Xem thêm: june nghĩa là gì

The fact that these noncoargument reflexives allow syntactic binding clearly indicates that syntactic binding is not restricted đồ sộ reflexives in direct argument positions.

Sentence-internal features, lượt thích reflexives then, are among the few phenomena not treated in the book.

Các ý kiến của những ví dụ ko thể hiện tại ý kiến của những chỉnh sửa viên Cambridge Dictionary hoặc của Cambridge University Press hoặc của những ngôi nhà cho phép.